Selecting a trustworthy online casino takes clear thinking, because the conditions make the difference well beyond bold slogans. To get a practical comparison, many readers frequently look at international casinos, provided they study the details closely. A valid licence is the essential thing to check, because it shows that the operator follows firm requirements. Bonuses draw attention, yet their real value depends on the wagering terms, which deserve a careful review. Banking methods should be flexible, and the withdrawal speed is often one of the most telling signs of a honest site. The game library is generally broad, from classic slots to roulette, giving users plenty of options. A live casino attracts players with real dealers, and the stream quality shape the overall session. Helpful support sets the difference when questions arise, especially if quick replies are easy to reach. Withdrawals show the true character of a casino, so clear limits and quick processing earn loyalty. Responsible play has to stay central, so deposit limits and clear budgets truly safeguard the account holder. A valid licence is the key thing to check, because it signals that the platform meets firm rules. Bonuses catch the eye, yet their real value hinges on the playthrough conditions, which repay a careful read. Deposit choices should be secure, and the withdrawal speed is frequently one of the clearest indicators of a honest casino. The game library is usually broad, from jackpot games to baccarat, bringing users genuine variety. A live casino draws in players with an authentic table, and the betting limits drive the overall experience. Helpful support marks the difference once problems show up, above all if quick replies are available. Withdrawals expose the true character within a casino, so reasonable checks and steady speed earn trust. Responsible play must remain central, so self-exclusion and calm habits always safeguard the player. A valid licence is the first thing to verify, because it signals that the platform respects strict standards. Bonuses look tempting, yet their true worth hinges on the playthrough conditions, which reward a close look. Payment options should be convenient, and the payout time is frequently one of the clearest marks of a fair brand. All in all, a thoughtful selection rests on clear terms, so take your time, check the rules and set clear limits.

Cogérants de société : la faute de l’un est-elle aussi celle de l’autre ?

  • Gescompo
  • Aucun commentaire

Cogérants de société : la faute de l’un est-elle aussi celle de l’autre ?

Cogérants de société : la faute de l’un est-elle aussi celle de l’autre ? 150 150 Gescompo

Suite à la mise en liquidation judiciaire de leur société, 2 cogérants se voient reprocher différentes fautes de gestion. Des fautes dont l’un d’eux estime, cependant, ne pas être responsable. Va-t-il obtenir gain de cause ?


1 faute = 1 (et 1 seul) responsable

Suite à sa mise en liquidation judiciaire, le liquidateur d’une société décide d’engager la responsabilité de ses 2 cogérants.

Ceux-ci ont, d’après lui, commis différentes fautes de gestion qui ont contribué à aggraver les dettes de la société : ils doivent donc, par conséquent, être condamnés ensemble à les prendre en charge.

A tort, souligne l’un des gérants, qui rappelle que les fautes en question ont été commises par son co-gérant..

A défaut de faute personnelle de sa part, il n’a donc pas à supporter les dettes de la société…

Ce que confirme le juge : parce qu’il n’a pas personnellement commis de fautes de gestion, le cogérant en question n’a pas à prendre en charge les dettes de la société.

Source : Arrêt de la Cour de cassation, chambre commerciale, du 17 juin 2020, n° 18-18321 (NP)

Cogérants de société : la faute de l’un est-elle aussi celle de l’autre ?© Copyright WebLex – 2020

Enter your
text here